This week I started the process of my project. I started doing it on Photoshop because I am more familiar with the program and I wanted to do a glitch effect at the onset of the video, but realized that I would have to animate everything individually frame-by-frame in Photoshop, which is fine but I am going to try and see if I can transfer what I have so far to After Effects or Animate so I can have an easier time animating the piece. So far I think the aesthetic I'm going for is a plain black background with white lettering, but including a glitch effect so it looks like it is being shown on one of those old boxy TVs for nostalgia factor to go with the theme of the poem itself. The poem is styled like a eulogy. For particular words, especially ones that conjure up some sort of imagery, I want to mimic the movement or the shape of that imagery through animation to give emphasis to them and make the poem seem more animate and alive.
Before reading the articles, I did not know much about electronic literature, let alone that it was a medium of literature that was gaining popularity. I found one particular point in the "Principles of New Media" article interesting—digital language art is a collaboration between human creation and computer interface. It is an idea that should seemingly be common sense, but that I personally did not think about before. Prosthesis was particularly interesting when thinking about the idea of human/computer collaboration to create art. Ian Hatcher sampled his own voice for his work but implemented the samples in a way that sounded computerized and artificial but still somehow human, as though it were in were in between the two. I feel like this concept highlights digital language art being partly human and partly digital, and how it can manipulate language in ways that traditional art like creative writing and oration cannot. "Long Rong Song," too, utilized coding ...
Comments
Post a Comment